SSC leaks Aero II, SVT Raptor, 2013 Formula One rules

hey derrick d my friend and i are arguing on the subject can u tell how fast a car can go without actually driving it!!!! since the SSC II is coming out and there are already speculation on it beating the veron's top speed when the car hasnt been put to the test yet?

2013 F1 rules 4cylinders....really? guess ill just stop watching after webber takes the championship this year then.

Huuuu, that SSC is [insert explicatives here].
Seems far more refined & substantial than the previous model.
"October issue of TopGear magazine out thisWednesday"
Due to the time difference, you can roll out today TUE 18:00 =
WED UK time.

http://myspcars.blogspot.com/

See ya at CollegeFest...again

F1 Will Always be the premier level of motorsport.  The problem is that while aero and horsepower will be worked and improved upon year after year... the cars aren't really getting much faster.  The teams are being held back every year by silly regulations, which were put in place to ensure fairness and exciting racing, yet the cheating remains in the way of loopholes while the FIA tries to close up the loopholes for the next year, and play judge as to what types of "interpretations of the rules" are fair.  The turbo monsters of the early 90s were faster, and more exiting to watch, the cars were not safe though, and the drivers had to be crazy, and more skilled IMHO.
Back to the new rules... I just want to see less rules and more innovation, I don't like the idea of forcing teams to decide on a specific engine design.  Give them rules... hell, even a 1 liter engine could work if that the only major rule... everything else is fair game.... that could be fun.
anyway ... that was a failed rant

Goooooo 2nd Gen SSC AERO!!!!!
I see where F1 is going, but why turbocharged 4 cylinders?  thats an Epic FAIL!!!!!!  Yes i think F1 should go in the direction the 2 primary Racing Series IZOD indycar series, and LMS or Le Mans Series, for 2012 both Series are going to Run twin turbocharged V6 cylinder engines, not under developed 4cylinders

NO NOT REALLY SMART ONE.

I could accept a 6cylinder with 2 turbochargers like from 80's Renault RE40 ( Alain Prost/Eddie Cheever ) but a 4cylinder with KERS?.. even with better ground effect and aero manipulation.. a 4cylinder is just unacceptable, F1 will definitely lose it's essence as the world's premier motor sport if they go this direction.
 I can already hear the strained sound of defeat from this engine.

i did laugh, derek

bags are for groceries you silly dubbers

Nerd Alert! 

There is no such thing as a Brontosaurus. It was an Apatosaurus with the wrong skull.

But there is a Triceratops. There was fear the Triceratops name would be changed, because the Triceratops is the juvenile form of the Torosaurus, but according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature the first name published is the valid name. Triceratops was published in 1889, Torosaurus in 1891.

And yes, I did have dinosaur footy pajamas.

Derek, you forgot to mention the recently found funny dinosaur: the tri-carrot-top

F1 needs to bring back V10. Global warming or climate change is nothing but BS. 20 V10 running 18 weekends a year is not going to do anything to planet earth. Environment crazy’s don’t even watch racing

Huuuu, that SSC is [insert explicatives here].
Seems far more refined & substantial than the previous model.
"October issue of TopGear magazine out thisWednesday"
Due to the time difference, you can roll out today TUE 18:00 =
WED UK time.